Industry x outcome evidence

Where AI outcomes are documented by industry

Compare how often real deployments report time, cost, quality, revenue, and other outcomes. Switch from evidence coverage to reported percentages, then open any cell to inspect its cases.

Cases with outcomes

1,702

48.3% of the catalog
Industries compared

18

with indexed deployments
Outcome categories

10

quantified categories
Matrix intersections

163

with reported evidence
Data updated 3 hours ago

Other x time & speed has the broadest relative evidence: 42 of 109 indexed cases (38.5%) report this outcome.

Cross-industry comparison

Share of each industry's cases reporting an outcome

Coverage compares unique deployments against the full indexed case count for that industry. Higher is broader evidence, not a larger result.

AI outcome evidence by industry and outcome category
IndustryTime & speed989 casesCost savings338 casesQuality & accuracy248 casesProductivity & throughput224 casesAutomation & deflection153 casesRevenue & growth136 casesCustomer experience89 casesAdoption & scale83 casesRisk, reliability & safety79 casesSustainability & resources39 cases
Healthcare503 indexed · 45.7% any outcome27%136 of 503 cases8.3%42 of 503 cases7.4%37 of 503 cases4%20 of 503 cases2.8%14 of 503 cases2.2%11 of 503 cases1.4%7 of 503 cases2.6%13 of 503 cases2%10 of 503 cases0.2%1 of 503 cases
Manufacturing427 indexed · 36.5% any outcome21.5%92 of 427 cases8.7%37 of 427 cases6.3%27 of 427 cases6.6%28 of 427 cases3%13 of 427 cases1.4%6 of 427 cases1.2%5 of 427 cases0.9%4 of 427 cases1.6%7 of 427 cases1.6%7 of 427 cases
Finance357 indexed · 58.3% any outcome33.6%120 of 357 cases10.1%36 of 357 cases10.6%38 of 357 cases9.8%35 of 357 cases6.7%24 of 357 cases5.6%20 of 357 cases3.9%14 of 357 cases3.6%13 of 357 cases3.9%14 of 357 cases0.3%1 of 357 cases
Tech & Comms302 indexed · 60.9% any outcome37.7%114 of 302 cases16.6%50 of 302 cases7.6%23 of 302 cases9.6%29 of 302 cases6.3%19 of 302 cases4.6%14 of 302 cases3.6%11 of 302 cases4.6%14 of 302 cases3.3%10 of 302 cases1%3 of 302 cases
Insurance264 indexed · 57.2% any outcome34.1%90 of 264 cases8.7%23 of 264 cases11.4%30 of 264 cases5.7%15 of 264 cases10.2%27 of 264 cases3.4%9 of 264 cases3.4%9 of 264 cases0.4%1 of 264 cases2.3%6 of 264 cases·
Retail216 indexed · 53.2% any outcome25.5%55 of 216 cases7.9%17 of 216 cases7.4%16 of 216 cases5.6%12 of 216 cases3.7%8 of 216 cases13.9%30 of 216 cases2.8%6 of 216 cases1.9%4 of 216 cases3.7%8 of 216 cases2.3%5 of 216 cases
Professional Services206 indexed · 46.1% any outcome30.6%63 of 206 cases9.7%20 of 206 cases6.8%14 of 206 cases9.2%19 of 206 cases6.3%13 of 206 cases5.3%11 of 206 cases3.9%8 of 206 cases1%2 of 206 cases1.9%4 of 206 cases·
Agriculture186 indexed · 36% any outcome10.8%20 of 186 cases8.1%15 of 186 cases4.3%8 of 186 cases4.3%8 of 186 cases·2.7%5 of 186 cases0.5%1 of 186 cases1.6%3 of 186 cases0.5%1 of 186 cases4.8%9 of 186 cases
Public Sector184 indexed · 46.7% any outcome28.8%53 of 184 cases7.6%14 of 184 cases6%11 of 184 cases3.3%6 of 184 cases3.8%7 of 184 cases2.7%5 of 184 cases2.7%5 of 184 cases2.2%4 of 184 cases2.2%4 of 184 cases0.5%1 of 184 cases
Energy & Utilities127 indexed · 42.5% any outcome26.8%34 of 127 cases10.2%13 of 127 cases2.4%3 of 127 cases3.9%5 of 127 cases1.6%2 of 127 cases2.4%3 of 127 cases2.4%3 of 127 cases3.9%5 of 127 cases2.4%3 of 127 cases3.1%4 of 127 cases
Logistics122 indexed · 45.9% any outcome25.4%31 of 122 cases9%11 of 122 cases6.6%8 of 122 cases7.4%9 of 122 cases4.9%6 of 122 cases2.5%3 of 122 cases1.6%2 of 122 cases0.8%1 of 122 cases2.5%3 of 122 cases0.8%1 of 122 cases
Consumer & Food119 indexed · 52.9% any outcome30.3%36 of 119 cases5.9%7 of 119 cases5%6 of 119 cases5.9%7 of 119 cases5.9%7 of 119 cases7.6%9 of 119 cases3.4%4 of 119 cases6.7%8 of 119 cases0.8%1 of 119 cases·
Other109 indexed · 60.6% any outcome38.5%42 of 109 cases11.9%13 of 109 cases6.4%7 of 109 cases8.3%9 of 109 cases1.8%2 of 109 cases2.8%3 of 109 cases4.6%5 of 109 cases8.3%9 of 109 cases2.8%3 of 109 cases3.7%4 of 109 cases
Education92 indexed · 46.7% any outcome27.2%25 of 92 cases10.9%10 of 92 cases3.3%3 of 92 cases5.4%5 of 92 cases2.2%2 of 92 cases1.1%1 of 92 cases4.3%4 of 92 cases1.1%1 of 92 cases2.2%2 of 92 cases·
Automotive89 indexed · 39.3% any outcome22.5%20 of 89 cases6.7%6 of 89 cases4.5%4 of 89 cases3.4%3 of 89 cases2.2%2 of 89 cases·2.2%2 of 89 cases·1.1%1 of 89 cases1.1%1 of 89 cases
Pharma80 indexed · 42.5% any outcome27.5%22 of 80 cases11.2%9 of 80 cases3.8%3 of 80 cases7.5%6 of 80 cases2.5%2 of 80 cases··1.2%1 of 80 cases··
Legal76 indexed · 27.6% any outcome18.4%14 of 76 cases2.6%2 of 76 cases2.6%2 of 76 cases3.9%3 of 76 cases1.3%1 of 76 cases·····
Real Estate68 indexed · 54.4% any outcome32.4%22 of 68 cases19.1%13 of 68 cases11.8%8 of 68 cases7.4%5 of 68 cases5.9%4 of 68 cases8.8%6 of 68 cases4.4%3 of 68 cases·2.9%2 of 68 cases2.9%2 of 68 cases

Empty cells have no documented outcome in the current snapshot. Coverage and case-count views use unique deployments, while reported-result medians use percent-comparable metrics. Vendor-published evidence skews toward successful results.

How this matrix is measured

A case contributes once to an industry-outcome cell even when it contains several metrics. Evidence coverage divides that unique case count by all indexed cases in the industry. Reported result shows the median percentage for the direction with more comparable metrics; reductions and improvements remain separate and are never netted together.