Onboarding multi-agent system
Quick wins · 3 cases
Industry domain insight
Executive brief
Staff assistant is 13× more concentrated here than across AI overall. Deployments of this type report a median +52% other quantified impact.
Cases
111
36 in the last 6 months
Innovativeness
100% of evidence scored
Agent cases
43
15 in the last 6 months
Start here: Code assistant — high impact for relatively low build effort (5 cases).
Prioritization
Where each Tech & Communications Human Resources use-case type lands on build effort against business impact, positioned relative to the other types shown — the dashed crosshair is the peer median, so the split separates higher- from lower-leverage types. Dot size reflects how many cases back each type; the dashed indigo zone marks the sweet spot. Impact and effort figures in the list are the true 1–5 averages.
Trending — published in the last 6 months
Use-case types
Hover to highlight · Click to open
Onboarding multi-agent system
Quick wins · 3 cases
Staff assistant
Quick wins · 3 cases
Customer experience analytics
Big bets · 2 cases
Conversational assistants agent
Big bets · 2 cases
Customer personalization copilot
Big bets · 4 cases
AI agents agent
Big bets · 3 cases
Automotive operations agent
Big bets · 4 cases
Fraud detection
Incremental · 5 cases
Customer support automation
Incremental · 4 cases
IT operations
Incremental · 2 cases
Compliance agent
Deprioritize · 2 cases
Code assistant
Incremental · 5 cases
Customer service voice
Incremental · 10 cases
Workflow orchestration multi-agent system
Deprioritize · 6 cases
The use-case types deployed most often in this view, ranked by volume and coloured by recent momentum.
20 use-case types in view; Customer service voice leads with 10 cases, and 17 of the 55 shown were published in the last 6 months.
The use-case types this view over-indexes on versus the whole corpus — what makes this slice different from AI overall.
Staff assistant is 13× more common here than across all cases — the strongest signal of what sets this view apart.
1× = corpus average — bars extend right by how far each type over-indexes here.
Lift compares each type's share of this view against its share of all 3,280 cases.
How the documented deployments in this view were built — custom engineering (Build), an off-the-shelf assistant (Buy), or low-code assembly (Compose).
Full report
Expand any section for the detail behind the summary above.