Lander & Rogers and Clifford Chance automate legal processes to boost productivity and precision
Leading law firms in Australia, including Lander & Rogers and Clifford Chance, are harnessing Microsoft Copilot to transform their operations and client service. By integrating AI into document drafting, research, legal technology development, and client communication, these firms automate repetitive tasks and support high-level legal work. Microsoft Copilot, built on OpenAI's GPT-3.5, suggests contextually relevant language, enables rapid and accurate document creation, supports legal research, and aids in generating and reviewing legal code. These innovations not only save time and costs but also elevate accuracy and consistency, freeing lawyers for complex, strategic, and client-facing activities. The firms showcase how generative AI and Copilot reshape legal work for the modern era.
- Organization
- Lander & Rogers
- Industry
- Legal
- Location
- Australia
- Published
- March 2024
Reported outcomes
Strategic outcomes
Primary read
Use case focus
Showing 3 of 4
- 1Automated legal document drafting and review
- 2AI-supported legal research and precedent analysis
- 3Coding assistance for legal technology platforms
- Large volumes of documentation increase workload and risk of errors.
- Manual research and drafting are time-consuming and slow down client service.
- Clients demand faster, clearer, and more precise communication.
- The evolving legal landscape requires adaptability and constant learning.
- Deployed Microsoft Copilot to automate legal document drafting and review.
- Used Copilot for advanced legal research—suggesting arguments and referencing precedents.
- Leveraged Copilot for coding assistance in legal technology applications.
- Adopted AI-driven tools to enhance internal and client-facing communications.
- Significant boost in operational efficiency and productivity.
- Lawyers save hours previously spent on routine drafting and research.
- Reduced risk of errors in legal documentation due to AI-powered consistency checks.
- Enhanced client engagement and communication clarity.
Sources & evidence1
The same organization appears in newer AI deployment evidence.
- Same organization re-documented as recently as 2025.
- Cited source last checked Jun 1, 2026 — ok (0/1 broken).
Measures whether this deployment's public evidence persists — not whether the system is still in production.
AI-generated summary. Verify important details with the linked sources before relying on this case.
Explore related AI use cases
Was this useful?